2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected, and that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the same criminal record or fine.

However, the crime of this case is that the defendant employs an employee in a marina room for about 10 months and arranges commercial sex acts; the act of arranging commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts, etc. is highly harmful to society by commercializing women's sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals; the period of the business of this case is not less than 10 months and the profits accrued therefrom seems to be considerable; the scope of the recommended sentence for the crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court's Sentencing Commission is from 6 months to 4 months; the sexual traffic crime group; the second type of the commercial sex crime of this case of this case of this case of 19 years to 19 years to 19 years to 19 years to 19 years to 19 years to 19 years to 20 years to 20 years to 20 years to 20 years to 30 years to 20 years to 30 years to 4 years to

In full view of the above favorable circumstances and conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstances after the commission of the crime, and other various circumstances, which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the trial process, even if considering all favorable circumstances for the Defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair since the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.