beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.10 2015고정704

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in daily work.

1. On April 20, 2014, at around 22:16, the Defendant: (a) considered the victim (the 63 years of age) who performed drinking together with three other persons, such as the Defendant and the usual F, from the side table table, while drinking the mixed drinking in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (b) considered that the victim (the 63 years of age) was fluencing the Defendant; (c) flucing the Defendant; (d) flucing the victim’s head, fluent, sound, and flucing the victim’s head, and fluencing the victim’s chest by his hand.

2. Victims G;

A. From June 7, 2014 to June 19:00 to December 21, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s business by hearing the horses to change the credit rating from the victim, who is the owner of the business, at the Ix located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju. On January 2014, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business by force, such as: “F and the Defendant, at the time of investigating the police in the fighting case, made a statement favorable to F, that the victim made a statement in favor of F, or that the victim made a statement favorable to F, with the victim.” The Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s restaurant business by force, such as having the victim make a statement favorable to F and the Defendant.

B. On August 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 13:00 to 15:00 on August 14, 2014, the Defendant: (b) took a look at the said I week; and (c) took a dispute with the victim for the same reason as Paragraph (1), and (d) took a bath to the large interest, such as, “Ispath, Spath, Mara, spath, spath, spath, etc.”; and (c) 1 and 2 of the market price, which is the victim’s possession on the table, carried the table, the Defendant spathed, and caused the customers on the spath to leave the spathum.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property and interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.With respect to G, C, and F, respectively.