beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.04.13 2017고합42

전차교통방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 2016, around 21:20, the Defendant interfered with the passage of the electric vehicle by allowing the suspension of the operation of the electric vehicle on the line No. 4 of the subway No. 21:20 on December 10, 2016, by using approximately 1.1km from the Sinpo-si B subway No. 4 Line C to the subway No. 4 Line E, located in Sinpo-si D, militarypo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first trial protocol (No. 16 of this Court Order 2017) ;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 186 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. The reason for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter, taking into account the following favorable circumstances among the reasons for the sentencing) is that the Defendant interfered with the operation of the electric vehicle, resulting in inconvenience to many passengers using the electric vehicle, resulting in danger to the overall traffic safety of the electric vehicle. In light of the characteristics of the electric vehicle traffic, the above crime committed by the Defendant on the basis of the nature of the electric vehicle may lead to a large-scale accident, it is true that the Defendant requires strict punishment.

However, the defendant found that he was wrong at the latest time, and appears to have committed the crime of this case by contingency in order to promptly start the house, and recognized the crime of this case, and reflects his mistake.

The sentencing factors shown in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, sex, family relation, environment, occupation, etc., shall be determined by taking into account all the factors of sentencing as ordered.