A. In light of the fact that the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence of a fine of one million won imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The court below found that the defendant supported the victim's left side with tobacco by supporting the victim's face and sealed the victim's face with the victim's left side and caused an injury to the victim's days of treatment that the victim exceeded the part of the victim's left part of the victim's face by considering the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below.

Examining the above judgment of the court below closely with the evidence, the judgment is just and acceptable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant, while making a dispute with the victim’s age more than the age, appears to have reached the instant crime by contingency, there is no record of criminal punishment since 2009, and that he/she must support the wife and three children.

However, in light of the fact that the crime of this case is very poor that the victim's bucket caused the injury, and the fact that the defendant is against the judgment of the court of the court of the court of the case, and other various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and Article 364 of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.