beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2019.08.28 2019고단539

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

Nos. 1 through 8, 10 and 10, respectively, shall be charged to the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging the exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

The Defendant is a person who operates a game hall in the name of “C” in the original week B.

From March 12, 2018 to December 11, 2018, the Defendant set up 60 game machine such as the above game room and the “satise” in the above game room, and provided 60 games to customers, and exchanged the score acquired as a result of the game by the customers by converting the score acquired as a result of the game into 10% per unit and deducting 10% of the fee.

As a result, the defendant exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. The statement statement of each police officer made to a person who has failed to obtain his/her name;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Each investigation report, records of seizure, on-site photographs;

1. Application of statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry for Criminal Facts;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;

1. Collection [200,000 won per day average exchange commission 90,000 won x total number of business days of the defendant 270 days] Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act includes circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as that the defendant, who is North Korean defectors of the reason for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on Promotion of Game Industry, is divided in depth, and that the defendant's detention entails a certain degree of difficulty to his family members. However, the defendant committed the crime of this case as a unemployment owner immediately after being suspended from indictment on March 29, 2018 (employee's participation in the crime of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act). The act of exchanging the result obtained through the use of game products in real money is likely to be subject to strict social prohibition.