The defendant is attached Form 2.3 to the plaintiff AP.

A. During the period from December 3, 1948 to May 6, 1951, the number of the residents of each Eup/Myeon in the Do of the Republic of Korea in the Korean War, the police officers belonging to the Korean Armed Forces Group 4 Joints and Veterans, Group 20 of the 11st century, Group 20 of the 8th class, the police station in the area of the fire fighting, and its affiliated branch, and police officers belonging to the police station in the area of the Republic of Korea, the police team in the relevant area by the Do of the Republic of Korea, the colon of the anti-military and cos in the process of the fire fighting, the prompt cos in the process of the fire fighting operations, and the family members of the winners and cos.

(hereinafter referred to as "sacrific sacrifice case against civilians in the area of the Republic of Korea"). (2)

1) The Framework Act on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on Settlement of History") shall apply to the Act on Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation.

(2) The Committee on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation (hereinafter referred to as the “Committee on Settlement of History”) established by the Committee.

(3) The truth-finding decision is based on the fact-finding decision on May 11, 2010, based on the fact-finding decision on the following: (a) whether the civilian sacrifice case was made by the petitioner and the reference witness; (b) whether the body was recovered; and (c) whether the body was recovered; and (d) whether the body was dead in the process of the case; and (c) where the body was specifically identified by the petitioner’s witness and experience; and (c) where the body was not recovered; and (d) where the body was not recovered, the witness’s statement was credibility even if the body was not recovered; and (e) the body was not recovered; and (e) the body was presumed as a victim if the body was not recovered; and (e) it was difficult to determine the exact place of sacrifice as the victim (hereinafter “the fact-finding decision”).

2) Under the findings of the truth-finding process of this case, the past reorganization commission: (a) the network A, B, C, F, E, and others.