도로법위반
The defendant is innocent.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the defendant's employee Gap's act violated the restrictions on the operation of the vehicle by loading the freight to exceed the total weight of B vehicle on the road front of the fluence fluence fluence fluor at port around November 10, 1993 at the time of port on November 3:23, 1993.
However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged retroactively loses its effect according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality on Dec. 29, 201.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.