2. The judgment is a favorable condition to the defendant that the defendant reflects his mistake, and that the defendant has no record of punishment.

However, in this case, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant as a public official by making the state's financial aggravation by committing a crime by deceiving the government's subsidies, etc. and ultimately increasing the citizens' tax burden. The defendant involved in each crime of this case as a public official; there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below; and the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and considering various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sex, motive, means and consequence of the crime; it is deemed that the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too too unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.