[Criminal Justice] On September 4, 1997, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny for ten months at the Jeonju District Court on May 15, 2002, to a fine of ten million won at the Seoul Eastern District Court on May 15, 2002, to a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Changwon District Court on April 28, 2010, three years of suspended execution for two years, and on October 31, 2014, one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Changju District Court's Chungcheong Branch.

On May 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch on May 18, 2017 and completed the execution of the final sentence in the net prison on January 18, 2019

【Criminal Facts】

At around 08:45 on April 24, 2020, the Defendant: (a) accessed the victim C’s behind the cosmetic which neglected due diligence in order to purchase a string horse in front of the beauty art room located in Gangnam-gun, Gangnam-gun; (b) cut off one cash of KRW 100,000,000, No. 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000, won, etc., were used as the following: (a) one copy; (b) one copy; (c) one copy; (d) one copy; (d) one copy; and (e) one copy; and (e)

As a result, the defendant who has been sentenced twice or more due to larceny, etc. and habitually stolen the victim's property within three years after the execution of the sentence is completed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. A report on internal investigation (related to the verification of CCTV images on a DNA store and the attachment of photographs), CCTV closure photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports (A), investigation reports (reports during the same criminal records and the period of repeated crimes);

1. Habituality of the judgment: The records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the same type of crimes are repeated in the same form as the judgment, and the crimes of this case also are committed.