Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

The Defendant, with knowledge of the fact that “the persons who will withdraw money to take over the passbook” from C, which is an organization of telephone financial fraud (hereinafter “Sing”), sought to offer the withdrawal of the money to D (in the continuance of the first instance trial after being indicted for detention) and E (in the continuation of the first instance trial after being indicted for non-detention) with the knowledge of the fact that the money to take out was related to the Singing fraud, and offered to offer the said D and E as the withdrawal of the Singing, and D and E as the withdrawal of the money deposited in their own account, and conspired to withdraw the money from the Singing victims’ money deposited in their own account and deliver it to the Singsorgs in the name of the non-sing organization that is the organization of Sing.

Accordingly, around November 26, 2014, the Defendant prepared a cash card and identification card to D, instructed D to be mistaken with Seoul Franshion, and notified D and E of D and E of his intention in accordance with the above instructions on November 27, 2014, and C sent the above increased arrival to D and E to D and E, and C decided to transfer D and E to Joseon and to withdraw the money of the victims of the scaming fraud.

1. On or around November 27, 2014, the employee in charge of scaming the victim F and misrepresenting the investigator of the public prosecutor’s office to be investigated into the criminal organization. It is necessary to confirm whether the money in the head of the Tong was due, and deposit KRW 23,50,000 to the ScC bank account, and enter the account number and password by accessing the website of the public prosecutor’s office. It is false to the effect that the employee in charge of scaming the victim to enter the account number and password by accessing the fabricated site as above and accessing the Internet banking site without authority. It transfers KRW 23,50,000 to the victim’s new bank account (H) in the name of the victim by entering the password (G) without authority by accessing the Internet banking site.