2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and that there was no record of the same kind of crime is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the degree of damage suffered by the victim is not less severe and the victim's desire to punish the defendant's severe punishment is disadvantageous.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and the environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable and unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.