2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The plaintiff was discharged from military service on December 5, 1956 when he entered the Army on June 9, 1952.

B. On December 25, 1952, the Plaintiff suffered injury to the right-hand bridge and the right-hand arms by temporarily cutting off a strings from the attack of the People’s Republic of Korea in the Mamar War of 1952, 2009.

The Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State on the ground that there was no evidence to verify that the said application was made in relation to the performance of the combat action by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement on January 6, 2010. (c) In around 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she was killed and wounded in action on the ground that he/she had sustained an injury in the Republic of Korea due to the attack of the People’s Republic of Korea in the Bama combat combat action, as seen above, he/she applied for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State on the ground that he/she had sustained an injury in the Republic of Korea. However, on July 4, 2016, the Plaintiff deliberated and resolved on the application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State on the ground that he/she did not meet the requirements of the person who has rendered distinguished service to the State on the ground that he/she had been unable to perform his/her duty on the ground that he/she had been on the ground that he/she was on the part of the State.

E. The Plaintiff, among the above dispositions, filed the instant lawsuit against the disposition that rendered non-conforming to the requirements of a person of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings.