Seized evidence 1 to 27 shall be confiscated.

The Defendant, along with an employee in charge of the name of the organization of Bosing “Ising”, concluded that “Ising a loan to an account designating money in the name of deposit because Ising the phone to many unspecified domestic unspecified victims,” and conspired to receive money from the victims. According to the above public offering, I would like to take deceptive act as above to a large number of victims, and to collect the account to receive money from the victims, and to collect cash cards, and the Defendant shared to take the role of withdrawing the money transferred by the victims to the account designated by the non-indicted, or of remitting the cash cards to be used for the crimes of Bosing.

1. The Defendant who violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act is obviously a clerical error in writing in the indictment on March 16, 2015.

At 270 U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S

As above, the Defendant acquired the access media necessary for electronic financial transactions.

2. On March 14, 2016, the names infinites who conspired with the Defendant with the Defendant for fraud would offer a loan to the victim E at an infinite place.

The false statement was made that the guarantee insurance deposit sent to an account designated as necessary.

However, the facts are that the defendant was not a credit service provider, and even if he was paid money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intent and ability to grant a loan to the victim, and the defendant, in collusion with the victim, deceiving the victim as above and belongs to the F on the same day from the victim.