2. The judgment of this case is a case where the defendant steals or attempted to steals goods from 34 victims for a period of one year, and the defendant confessions the crime of this case and repents in depth. However, although the defendant had a record of criminal punishment several times due to the same kind of crime, he completed the execution of punishment for the same crime, and again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, which is six months after the repeated crime, and stolen the goods of the victims who were killed in the room or resting room, and did not make any effort to recover damage to the victims until the trial, and in full view of all the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the above argument by the court below is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.