except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 31, 2014, the Defendant stated that “When the Defendant purchased a bus in a part of a bus and operates a bus, he/she can pay off the bus purchase price of KRW 35 million because he/she can pay off the bus purchase price of KRW 35 million because he/she purchased the bus in a part of a bus because he/she concluded a contract for a bus commuting to going out or going out with the Hyundai mothers Company.”

However, even if the victim received money from the victim, there was no intention to purchase the bus, and there was no conclusion of the bus contract with the modern mother's service with the modern mother's service.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 35 million won from the victim for the purchase price of the bus on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law;

2. Where the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] is general fraud types 1 (less than 100 million won) and the mitigation area (one month to one year) (special mitigation person] and the punishment is not granted, or damage is recovered from considerable part;

3. Determination of sentence: The sentence shall be determined like the order, in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the fact that the crime of six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence is not committed in the planned point of view, but is agreed with the victim, the amount of fraud and the method of deception;