beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.03.23 2017고단64

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 64] The Defendant, around November 23, 2016, posted a letter to the victim Ha who visited the Defendant, posted a letter to the Internet NA, and sold a new letter to the victim Ha in contact.

A false statement was made.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to sell the new letter to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 150,000 won as sales proceeds from the single bank account (I) in the name of the Defendant from the victim.

In addition, from around that time to December 15, 2016, the Defendant received a total of KRW 7,529,000 from 21 victims through the same method, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 1, from around that time to around December 15, 2016.

[2017 Highest 231] On September 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Seocheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) around September 3, 2016, the Victim E purchases online page “(s) 15FW World”; and (c) contacted the victims, thereby selling the clothing “beat 15FW World”.

A false statement was made.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to sell the above clothing to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 1,100,000 as sales proceeds to the national bank account (K) in the name of the Defendant, from the victim.

In addition, from around that time to October 18, 2016, the Defendant received a total of KRW 2,450,000 from four victims by the same method, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 2, from around that time to around that time.

[2017 Highest 296] The Defendant stated the date and time of the crime in the facts charged on December 11, 2016 as “the December 4, 2016.” However, it is a clerical error in the statement of “the December 11, 2016.”

The name and portrait of the Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu.