횡령
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor to the gist of the grounds for appeal, despite the fact that the defendant voluntarily consumeds the long-term repair appropriations of the building management body of this case and embezzled them, the court below found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case, by misapprehending the legal principles or misunderstanding the facts.
2. A thorough examination of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in light of the records, and the judgment of not guilty of the facts charged in this case on the basis of the circumstances stated by the court below is sufficiently acceptable, and there is no error of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as alleged by the prosecutor in the judgment of the court below. Thus, the prosecutor'
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.