When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 21:18, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the king 17 of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the king king 2 and the 3rd floor store; and (c) stolen goods of an amount equivalent to 14,800 won at the market price of the victim, Inc., Ltd., the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 19,000, 1900, contained in the shopping bags; and (d) used the 100, 100, 100, 100, and 2.3l,00,000 won among these goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s statement;

1. Receipts:

1. Evidence photographs;

1. A criminal investigation report (related to confirmation ofCCTV images);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV images extracted;

1. Article 329 (Selection of Fine) of the Criminal Act and Article 329 (Selection of Fine) of the Criminal Act regarding the crime of this case [Article 329 (Selection of Fine) of the Act on the Selection of Criminal Crimes, although defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not have the awareness of illegality at the time of the crime of this case, it is sufficient to recognize that the crime of this case was committed against social justice and sound reasoning. According to the above evidence, the defendant can sufficiently recognize that there was the awareness of illegality, and there is no other material to prevent the defendant from recognizing the fact that there was the awareness of illegality, the above defense counsel's assertion is rejected.

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;