2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 01:30 on November 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while getting a taxi in front of the 543 articles of incorporation located in Busan-gun, Busan-gun, Busan-gun; (b) took a large number of taxi expenses; and (c) refused the payment of taxi expenses while taking a bath; (d) the Defendant expressed that “nick G, a police officer belonging to the police station in charge of traffic accident prevention work, requested a slope and a slope H, who recommended a slope G to pay for taxi expenses and return to the Defendant, and thereby interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning police officers’ criminal prevention, such as assaulting and assaulting a bridge G’s spath.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statutes on each statement protocol with respect to D and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the prosecutor’s opinion) of the Act on the Custody in the Nowon-gu Station has interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer. The punishment against the defendant shall be determined in consideration of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant’s age, sexual behavior, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.