If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On August 16, 2017, at around 22:25, the Defendant committed assault, such as assaulting D from G on August 16, 2017, at “E” operated by D in Seo-gu, Seogu, Daegu, upon receiving the above 112 report, that was called “E,” and committing assaulting D from G, which was called the “F police station of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and G;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime of this case, the selection of a fine (the amount of fine shall be determined, taking into account the following circumstances as revealed in the argument of this case: (a) the defendant reflects against the time of committing the crime of this case; (b) the police officer expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant; (c) the defendant has the records of the same crime on the other hand;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;