2. After the judgment of the court below, the fact that the defendant deposited KRW 5,000,00 with the representative meeting of the occupants of the apartment house C as the principal and the principal, is a change in circumstances favorable to the defendant.

However, considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, considering the changes in the circumstances favorable to the defendant, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed unfair, even if considering the following factors, such as the type of occupational embezzlement and the amount of damage caused by breach of trust and the records of this case and the theory of changes in the amount of damage.

The defendant does not accept the defendant's unfair argument in sentencing.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.