식품위생법위반
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
"2012 Highest 2978"
1. From May 11, 2012 to November 19, 2012, Defendant A and the Defendants carried on entertainment tavern business without obtaining permission from the competent administrative agency by having the workers engaged in entertainment business under the name of “cating 25,000 won per hour” with the trade name of “N” on the apartment floor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, selling alcoholic beverages to customers and receiving 25,000 won per hour.
2. Defendant C, D, and E
A. The Defendants’ co-offenders, from February 2012 to May 2012, 201, told the persons listed in the [Attachment Nos. 1 to 4, including the Defendant A, to operate a video production room after registering as a business operator for the production of music records, music video products, and the sale of alcoholic beverages, and provided that they are capable of selling alcoholic beverages and be engaged in business if they operate a video production room. They installed a music video production device with approximately KRW 20 million for each business establishment with the cost of installing a music video production device and managing its business in the future. The Defendants assisted them to operate a music production room without the permission of the competent authorities.
B. Defendant C: (a) from June 2012 to November 201, 2012, the Defendant indicated in [Attachment 5 and 6] Nos. 5 and 6.
In the same manner as described in the paragraph, they assisted them to run entertainment tavern business without obtaining permission from the competent authorities.
C. Defendant D and E are the persons indicated in [Attachment 7 through 19] from June 2012 to November 2012.
In the same manner as described in the paragraph, they assisted them to run entertainment tavern business without obtaining permission from the competent authorities.
"2013 Highest 326"
1. Defendant C
A. The Defendant violates the Road Traffic Act (driving). < Amended by Act No. 971, Dec. 9, 2008>