A. The judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendants of this part of the facts charged is erroneous and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the following facts.

1) Defendant A’s part J, upon filing a complaint in G, purchased K’s right to sell the said housing site under the name of the Defendant, and argued that he is the owner of the right to sell the said housing site. However, this differs from the process of the purchase alleged by the Defendant. N, which arranged a sales contract for the said right to sell the housing site, did not receive a request from the J around March 25, 2005, and the J did not confirm whether the sale was made against the seller after March 2005 or require the necessary documents by lot. Meanwhile, the Defendant was present at the contract site of the instant factory site, and even during which the amount of KRW 230,130 million was paid from the Defendant’s account, which is half of the amount of KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000 from the Defendant’s account, and if the Defendant paid KRW 190,000,000,000,000,000 won to G, it could be paid KRW 1000.