업무상배임
The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendants is publicly announced.
1. Defendant A entered in the facts charged on or around March 7, 1996, with the duties of the Daewoo Shipbuilding Marine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Treatment Shipbuilding Sea”) or “victim company,” from around September 2002, Defendant A is the F representative director who supplies materials and tools to the supply department when requesting the supply department to purchase the materials and tools as requested by the production department and supplies them to the supply company. Defendant A is the F representative director who supplies the materials and tools to the treatment Shipbuilding Sea.
Defendant
A is a person in charge of the affairs such as the request for purchase, inspection, etc. of the construction section as above, so there was a duty to properly grasp the current status of demand for the construction section and request the purchase of a reasonable amount of construction section, and to check in detail whether the construction section supplied conforms with the construction section, item, quantity, etc. at the procurement department.
Nevertheless, Defendant A conspired with Defendant B to issue a detailed supply statement as if the supply was made by Defendant B without actually delivering Defendant B and H, and agreed that Defendant B would have divided the price for G, etc. from the sea of the treatment shipbuilding.
Accordingly, on June 2010, Defendant A violated his duties and ordered the procuring department to order the Defendant B to purchase G at the 15 G 1,725,000 won in total without receiving a request for purchase from the production department. After that, Defendant B issued a detailed supply statement and received the supply statement as if Defendant B received the supply of G without abnormal G on July 13, 2010, even though Defendant B received supply of G, Defendant B received KRW 1,725,000 in the name of the I Company B as the supply price for G from the account in the name of G.
As above, the Defendants conspired to enter the list of crimes in the annexed sheet 1 in G.