However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 16, 2008, the defendant of the forgery of private documents and the uttering of the above investigation document is within the Dongcheon-dong Community Center located in Suwon-si, Dongcheon-dong, Dongcheon-dong, Dongcheon-dong, and the facts for the purpose of exercising are stated "B" on the name of "B" and then affixed B's seal on the name of "B," the relation with the owner of the household, name and resident registration number "B," and the name of "B", and then affixed B's seal on October 16, 2008 to "B" and then presented it to the public official in charge of the above community service center without any authority.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a private document regarding a certificate of fact for the purpose of uttering and used a forged private document.

2. On July 22, 2010, the Defendant, who is a private or illegal user, prepared a move-in report of B that died for the purpose of exercising the same location as the above paragraph 1, and completed the report by stating “B” on “B” on the name of the former household owner or the name of the principal, and affixing the seal of “B” on the name, and presented it to the public official in charge of the above community service center who is unaware of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant used the private person of others for the purpose of exercising the right, and exercised the private person who used it unlawfully.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of D;

1. Application of each accusation, a copy of the move-in report, and an abstract of resident registration;

1. Articles 231, 234, 231, and 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that the report of this case under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not deemed to have been made with a particularly improper purpose, and the defendant.