However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 1, 2012, at around 01:30, the Defendant was on board the Dbee-cracked Driving's Dbee-cracked Driving on the top of the Dbee-cracked Driving, and was on the front side of Seoul.

During that period, C was under the influence of alcohol, the FSP car of E driving, which had been driven in two-lanes of the same room, caused a traffic accident where C received the above BSP car as the above BS car and suffered a necessary injury for E, etc. for about two weeks.

Around April 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) prepared a false statement at the G District Office in the Chungcheongbuk-gun Office; (b) even though C knew of the fact that a traffic accident caused by a drunk driving and committing an offense equivalent to or severer than a fine, and (c) made C escape an offender, such as preparing a false statement to the effect that “in order to avoid criminal punishment, he/she caused a traffic accident by driving a Vietnam-style cruise car under the influence of alcohol.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes (Evidence No. 5) shall include a fact-finding survey report, a fact-finding report, and a statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Relevant Article 151(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Social Service Order Act is that the nature of the crime of this case is poor: Provided, That the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration the fact that the defendant reflects the crime, and the age, character, conduct and environment of the defendant;