When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) viewed the victim E (56 years of age) to drink and drink in front of the D main shop located in Young-gu C, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) taken photographs; and (c) taken the pictures of the victim; and (d) whether the victim took a photograph of the photograph.

As stated in this subsection, the victim batddd batd batd batd batd batd twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, CCTV-cape photographs and CD 1 CDs;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order provides that the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate defense. However, if the defendant's act is considered as a legitimate defense, the defendant's act does not constitute a legitimate defense.

Therefore, the above argument is without merit.

[Judgment]