However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 14, 2015, from around 22:00 to 23:00 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) from the restaurant of the victim D’s “E” operated in Jungdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around July 14, 2015 to the day of 23:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by: (b) having the victim drinked alcohol and food equivalent to a total of KRW 76,000 in the market value; (c) having the victim received KRW 70,000; (d) having the victim’s refusal to do so; and (e) having the victim’s refusal to return home without paying the price, and (e) having the victim’s great sound, she could not enter the restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant: (a) at around 23:00 on July 14, 2015, at the above restaurant, the victim H (30 years of age) who was a guard belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving the said D’s 112 report, recommended the Defendant to return home after having the Defendant pay the food value; (b) the said G was defective in drinking water to the said G; (c) the Defendant took the Defendant’s chest from drinking; and (d) the Defendant took the Defendant’s chest from drinking to drinking; and (d) the Defendant was able to receive punishment for the above G’s h’s bridge part after having the Defendant cut back into the back bridge of the Defendant; and (e) the victim’s h’s bridge part after having the Defendant pushed back; and (e) the victim’s h’s face was sealed; and (e) the victim’s h’s h’s huming and h’s face can be punished against the police.

‘A' has taken his face to hear the horses.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in relation to the handling of 112 criminal reports, and at the same time, the victim H was knee part of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the I Statement;

1. Criminal facts;