2. The judgment is recognized as the Defendant recognized the instant crime, the Defendant’s act of lending the means of access to the electronic financial transaction is deemed to have no record of exceeding the same criminal records or fines, but there is a need to strictly punish the act of lending the means of access not only undermining the security and reliability of financial transaction, but also undermining the means of access to other crimes. The means of access provided by the Defendant has been abused for the scaming crime, in full view of the overall sentencing of the same and similar incidents, balance with the general sentencing of the Defendant in the same and similar cases, and other conditions of all the sentencing as shown in the instant records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.