If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who operates an entertainment center in the name of "C" on the B2th floor of Gwangju Mine-gu.

No. 17472 of August 11, 2020, anyone changed from the Minister of Health and Welfare to the Administrator of the Disease Management Agency through the revision of Act No. 17472 of Aug. 11, 2020;

A Mayor/Do Governor or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu shall not restrict or prohibit performances, assemblies, religious rites, or other large gatherings of people to prevent infectious diseases.

On September 20, 2020, the Gwangju Metropolitan City Mayor issued an order for collective restriction that prohibits the operation of entertainment establishments, entertainment establishments, singing practice establishments, etc. from 00:00 to 05:00 on September 27, 2020 to 00 on September 21, 2020 by extending the two steps of social distance rangeing from 00:0 to 05:00 on September 27, 2020 in order to block the dissemination of local communities in the community and strengthen the control over the airspace of 19 infectious diseases.

Nevertheless, at around 02:05 on September 26, 2020, the Defendant operated a business by providing two customers who visited a business establishment at the above entertainment shop with alcoholic beverages and accommodations and singing in line with anti-specing music in the guest room.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the measures of collective prohibition administrative order by the Gwangju Metropolitan City Mayor for the prevention of 19 infectious diseases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A ledger for the management of filing of an accusation, No. 2020-402 of the notification of the Gwangju Metropolitan City, a report on detection, and a food entertainment business license;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV photographs of the exposed site and CCTV photographs to customers in the business place;

1. Subparagraph 7 of Article 80 and Article 49 (1) 2 of the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act against a crime under the relevant Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the instant case violated a collective prohibition order to prevent the spread of new croccos or viruses, in view of the spread and health risks of the said infectious disease.