The defendant is the victim of the building Do precious metal store in Daegu-gu operated by the victim C, which is the victim's awareness of the building Do-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, where, by using the victim's belief, the victim sought money from the victim at a low price and made a false statement to obtain money.

1. On June 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stated on the instant precious metal store that “the Defendant would have the victim purchase 100 money at a low price as he/she would have ever been able to make a Gu-style sentence in the Gu-U.S. and intended to make a disposition of “E” in the Gu-U.S. dollars.”

However, the above gold banks did not exist, and the defendant did not have the intention or ability to purchase the net gold 100s.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 22 million won from the victim to the Daegu bank account in the name of F, namely, from the victim.

2. On June 26, 2012, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would sell 18K 20 knife 18K 20 knife on the face of the Defendant” to the victim at the location indicated in paragraph (1) of the same Article.

However, in fact, there was no fact that the defendant was asked to dispose of the defendant's punishment.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received one million won from the victim and acquired it by deception.

3. On June 27, 2012, the Defendant, at the same place as above, stated that “The Defendant would sell the amount of 50 e.g., net money from old and American E, which was intended to operate a family-friendly sentence and make a disposition while serving a family-friendly sentence, and would receive KRW 11 million up to 20 e.g., net money that was not received once the week.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to recover the above money to the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received nine million won from the Daegu Bank Account in the name of F on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim on three occasions and acquired it through 32 million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;