업무방해
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
Punishment of the crime
On August 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with labor at the Incheon District Court due to the crime of interference with business, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on December 20, 2017.
1. On February 3, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime of February 3, 2019, around 21:20, in the “D” restaurant of the victim’s “D” operated in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, under the influence of alcohol, expressed the victim’s “scamb”, etc. without any reason, and avoided the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding disturbance, such as taking a bath to, or going through, customers who refrain from, the alcohol.
2. On March 5, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime of March 5, 2019: (a) around 20:30 on March 5, 2019, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding the entrance of the State, blocking the entrance of the State, blocking other customers, such as H, and blocking them by hand, and obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.
3. On March 13, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime of March 13, 2019, around 13:20 on March 13, 2019, expressed the desire to “K Fishery Products” under the operation of the VictimJ in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Incheon, under the influence of alcohol, to “K Fishery Products,” and without any reason, to avoid the disturbance, such as “I are more likely to be less than our Marn. 1, 200,” and the victim’s escape from the disturbance, and obstructed the victim’s sales of fishery products by force.
4. On April 23, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime of April 23, 2019: (a) around 11:30 on April 23, 2019, by using a mobile phone owned by the “M” restaurant in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Incheon; (b) and (c) caused the occurrence of disturbance, such as the defect of the victim’s hump, i.e., the humbbbb, etc., and the humbing of the victim’s hump, etc., and the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police officer with respect to C and N.