except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 피해자 C에 대한 상해 및 공무집행방해 피고인은 2015. 6. 29. 22:18경 서울 광진구 D에 있는 ‘E’ 앞 길에서 술을 마시고 소란을 피우다가 신고를 받고 출동한 서울광진경찰서 F파출소 소속 경장인 피해자 C과 그곳을 지나가던 G으로부터 귀가하라는 말을 듣자 화가 나 주먹으로 위 G의 얼굴을 수회 때리고, 이에 피해자 C으로부터 현행범인으로 체포되자 피해자 C에게 “씨발새끼야, 내가 뭘 잘못했는데 차에 태우느냐, 여기서 해결하자고 씨발놈들아”라고 욕설을 하면서 손으로 피해자 C의 목을 잡아 비틀고 오른쪽 팔을 할퀴었다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of the crime by the victim, who is a police officer, and at the same time, the victim failed to receive medical treatment days.

2. On June 30, 2015, around 00:17, the Defendant used a toilet at the Seoul Minejin Police Station I office located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Minejin Police Station”) around 00:17, and the Defendant had the victim H’s face, a reduced person belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station, waiting for the Defendant to flee outside the toilet, was able to take twice as his hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of crimes by the victim, who is a police officer, and at the same time, the victim failed to receive treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the body photographs of victims and CCTV images;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.