However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 00:22, at a section of approximately 50 meters from 00 meters to 0.213% of the blood alcohol content in front of the diesel coffee shop in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, the Defendant driven a car by driving the car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the statement of the status of a drinking driver;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The defendant again commits the instant crime even though he had a previous conviction, the risk of drunk driving, and the purpose of the revision of the Road Traffic Act that intends to strengthen the punishment for drunk driving: considering the following circumstances: the defendant has no previous conviction, other than the previous conviction of a fine twice, the defendant reflects the criminal; the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation, family environment, etc.; and the sentencing conditions specified in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior;