However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car with Crato.

On December 19, 2014, the Defendant operated the said car on December 19, 2016, and continued the intersection in front of the restaurant located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, to the respective four-distance outflow from the lower intersection.

Since the location is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving cars to safely proceed with the signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded to turn back to the right side of the Gras drive of the victim F (the age of 48) who was driving at the intersection due to the negligence of proceeding even though it was a stop signal, and received the front part of the Gras car from the Defendant’s driving to the front part of the car in front of the car.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim FF, such as the right knee part knee part, which requires treatment for about two weeks, on the part of the victim H (the age of 19) who was aboard the said passenger car, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim I (the age of 69) who was on board the said passenger car, such as chloe, requiring treatment for about three weeks, such injury of brain fele, etc. requiring treatment for about four weeks to the victim J (the age of 68) who was on board the said passenger car, for about five weeks, such injury as brain felma, etc. requiring treatment for about five weeks. The Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim K (the age of 66) who is the same passenger, the victim K (the age of f6) in need of treatment for about five weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. F’s statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident report and each traffic accident report (1, 2) (1, 2) (1), respectively;

1. Application of each written diagnosis (K, J, I), each reply (H, F) statute;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act: