beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.03.09 2016나63651

운송료

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff A, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A is the owner of each of the vehicles C, D, and E, and Plaintiff B is the owner of the F-Motor vehicle (hereinafter the Plaintiffs’ vehicles are to be written at the end only four pages).

B. From October 20, 2014 to February 14, 2015, the Defendant paid transportation fees to the Plaintiffs in return for operating vehicles owned by the Plaintiffs for the Defendant’s business.

C. (1) Plaintiff A’s C vehicle operated a total of 142 items from October 26, 2014 to February 13, 2015, with a total of 30,879,636 won, D vehicle operated a total of 111 items from November 1, 2014 to February 14, 2015, with a total of 26,415,100 won, E vehicle operated a total of 96 items from November 16, 2014 to February 13, 2015, with a total of 24,717,090 won, and with a total of 82,01,826 won from January 15, 2015 to February 15, 2015, Plaintiff A’s vehicle operated a total of 15,150 won from December 215, 2015.

C. The Defendant paid various expenses related to vehicles to the Plaintiffs as indicated below, and the Plaintiffs and the Defendant agreed to appropriate the aforementioned expenses paid by the Defendant to pay the Plaintiffs’ transport fees.

Plaintiff

On November 25, 2014, 180,000 E vehicle garage certification 180,000 on December 1, 2014, 32014: (a) 1,918,070 I (including check 700,000) 1,918,070 on December 3, 2014; (b) E vehicle premium 230,000 of E 2 minutes on December 8, 2014; (c) E transport fee 400,005; (d) E transport fee 5,200,5200; and (d) E transport fee 18,636,250 CM 1,250 on December 1, 204 is merely 400,00,000, 200; (d) the Plaintiff cannot be found to have paid for more than 19,2748,270 CMM 250 C.

7 December 15, 2014 E.