On March 21, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 12:55 on March 21, 2016, and proceeded two-lanes on the road front of the 284-day front of the 3rd-day green distance in the direction of delivery from the direction of correspondence to the direction of delivery. In order to make a left-hand turn at the above 3rd-day green signal, the Defendant waiting at the front-hand part of the D Driving car, which is coming from the opposite direction of the mast, was found to be late and operated, but the Defendant did not stop the math, and received the left-hand part of the math-hand part of the math-off car.

The Defendant caused a serious injury to the victim F, who was accompanied by the foregoing occupational negligence, due to the 12 chest refluence of the 12nd chest, and the injury caused by the injury, such as the left-hand fluoral fladation of the fluor and the fladal fladation of the flag.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act

According to the written agreement attached to the record, it is reasonable to view that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the victim on December 21, 2016.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.