For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted each of the selective charges of this case on the ground that no proof of crime exists.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, and did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of fraud and attempted

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.