beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2017.05.11 2017고합1

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2017 Gohap 1】

1. On July 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim C would assist the victim C to undertake remodeling work in relation to the hotel cooking business in Indonesia located in Indonesia, where the victim is currently in progress, through D, his/her own death village.

However, in order to pass an immigration inspection, a document must be registered as an employee of the company in which he/she belongs, and a document should be prepared to be received a monthly wage of KRW 9 million in Korea from one month, and a passbook which contains approximately KRW 25 to 30% of the annual salary should also be created.

It shall send money to the head of the Tong to return money after making a document of evidence;

different types.

“A false statement” was made.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not run the hotel cooking business in the hotel cooking business, and there was no intention or ability to allow the victim to conduct the hotel cooking business even if he received money from the victim, as he thought that he would use the money from the victim to repay his personal debt, such as return of deposit money for lease on a deposit basis.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received transfer of KRW 2 million from the victim to the NongHyup Bank account (F) in the name of E on July 20, 2012; and (c) received transfer of KRW 2,5460,000 from that time to November 1, 2012, including transfer of KRW 2,560,000,000 from that time under the same name as shown in attached Table 1 (1).

2. Crimes against victims G;

A. A. Around March 15, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) was aware that at the Doldong branch of the Doldong-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the victim G, who was in a teaching relationship, had an interest in the operation of the Doling Center. As such, the Defendant was aware of the victim’s interest in the establishment of the Doldong Office of Education through public officials in the process of establishing the Doldong Office of Education.