When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a general office worker who uses the “E” from the NAV carpet “D,” and the victim F is a H company representative who sells the U.S. direct import risk in the Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City.

1. The Defendant of defamation: (a) connects the Defendant to the “E” by Handphones with Handphones from his or her dwelling premises, U.S. Seo-gu, U.S., Seo-gu, 20:41 on May 3, 2016; and (b) connects the Defendant to the “E” under the Handphones from his or her dwelling premises, 103 Dong 2002.

ㅠㅠ” 제하 “ 일산에서 J 침대 매트리스 보러 다녀왔어요

At present H Titrrrrrhe had been moving to as if the product was a new product.

(b) Mea sa sa sa sa sa sa sa sa sa-sa.

(Haym) by means of inserting a notice on the inside of the word “influence”, the victim’s reputation was undermined by disclosing any false fact openly.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business operation of H by spreading false facts, such as the preceding paragraph, thereby interfering with the business operation of H operated by the victimized person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness K and F;

1. Complaint;

1. Recordings [This writing is written by the drilling without going through the proper process of confirmation as to what kind of product the Defendant sold by the injured party, and it is not written to the effect that it is likely to be a valuable good, but rather written to the effect that “as if used goods are new goods,”

S. S. S. S.-S. S. S. S. S.R. on the domestic market of goods

The expression "the purpose of which is to explicitly indicate that the goods already used are once again sold is to slander the victim."

[No. 3]

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. for Criminal Facts, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The aggravated Criminal Act for concurrent crimes.