beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.08.29 2014고단1608

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 9, 2014, at around 04:20, the Defendant was urged to return home in a lock by C to a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Dongdaemun Police Station B police box called Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, where he was under the influence of alcohol at the 8-ro 4-gil, Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, to return home.

The Defendant, on the ground that he was broken as above, she saw C to take a bath by “Yei, C police spaw, ring,” and continued to board and operate the patrol vehicle on which C was on board, but obstructed the operation of the said 112 patrol vehicle by blocking the front and blocking “Isle, Isle, Isle, Isle, Isle, Isle.”

After all, the Defendant heard warning broadcasting over several occasions, “Il2 patrols. I will do. I will do. I.S. I. I.S. I would like to read “C. I.S. police officer will s. will s. will s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, s. will do, and will do, s. will do, s.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (report on the recording of statements filed by a shotator);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It shall be judged as above in light of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the defendant repents his mistake, appears to be a contingent crime committed under the influence of alcohol, the defendant has no record of committing the same kind of crime, nor has no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine) or above the suspended execution of sentence;