However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a building B in Busan Suwon-gu, and a “D King practice room” in subparagraph C.

In spite of the fact that a singing practice room business operator was prohibited from selling or providing alcoholic beverages, the Defendant received 20,000 won from the customers of his or her nameless boxes in the said singing practice room around January 18, 2019 and sold alcoholic beverages, such as cattle 1 bottle, beer, and four bottles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of crackdown on public morals, notification of detection of violated places of business, violation photographs, photographs of certificates of registration of singing practice room business, and application of statutes governing certificates of registration of business operators

1. Article 34 (3) 2 of the Music Industry Promotion Act and Article 22 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case again for a long time after the control over the same kind of crime, etc., and favorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all other circumstances revealed in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, the environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime