2. It is recognized that the circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession and the fact that most of the larceny victims were recovered and returned to the victims are recognized.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant who stolen the wall, cell phone, body card, etc. from four victims and purchased goods using the stolen body card. The crime of this case was committed again by the defendant who had been sentenced several times due to the same kind of crime and was released from the prison by being sentenced for the same kind of crime, and by one month or more. The court below determined the punishment by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant. The court below determined the punishment by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant. There is no change of circumstances that may consider the sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and other circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.