However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a new car in Category B.

On June 29, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vans around 11:50 on June 29, 2018, and driven the long long-distance in the night tower located in the area of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, along the “scopic distance” from the “scopic distance,” the Defendant proceeded at an unscopic speed along the two-lanes between three lanes.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty to safely drive a motor vehicle in accordance with traffic signals to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to enter the intersection in the yellow fresh, thereby driving the Defendant at the front section of the Defendant’s fresh in the direction of the “fresh of the night tower” from the “fresh of the night tower” to the “fresh of the front section of the Defendant’s fresh.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as above, suffered injury to the victim E (V, 49 years of age), victim F (n, 65 years of age), victim G (n, 53 years of age), victim H (n, 61 years of age), victim I (n, 76 years of age), and victim I (n, n, n, and g6 years of age) for approximately two weeks of medical treatment; and the victim C suffered injury, such as sprinking of a sprink for about eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of C, E, F, G, H, and I;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Since each of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is in a mutually competitive relationship, it is excluded from the application of the sentencing guidelines in principle, but it is recommended to be a single criminal offense.