However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C New Franchises.

On March 9, 2017, the Defendant proceeded along the two-laned roads in the direction of the court from March 9, 2017 to the first intersection in the direction of the court.

It is immediately preceding the intersection, and the defendant is the front of the driver's vehicle driven by the victim E (41) in the same direction. In such a case, there was a duty of care to secure and proceed with a safety distance that can be avoided when the driver of the vehicle stops and stops the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and tried to drive a mobile phone that fell away from the driver’s seat while driving in one lane prior to the beginning of the vehicle with the highest speed to stop. The Defendant got the back of the vehicle with the highest speed to stop, and let the vehicle driven in the front by the victim G (51 years old) who stopped in the front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc., and suffered injury to the victim G, such as light base and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant, at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and damaging each car, repair cost, 1,379,728 won to ensure that the victim E is 2,651,90 won, repair cost, repair cost, 1,728 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on internal investigation (an investigation into testimony, etc. of a wooden person);

1. A traffic accident investigation report and a written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Address number of the skin vehicle;

1. On-site photographs and black stuffs.