부정수급액반환명령등 취소청구의 소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff, a company running the taxi passenger transport business, concluded a contract with the Plaintiff’s employees 135 workplace skill development training (title: C, period: from February 16, 2016 to April 15, 2016; hereinafter “instant training”) by means of remote training with the Plaintiff’s employees, and received subsidies from 118 trainees (hereinafter “instant trainees”) under the premise that the instant training was conducted normally and the payment of subsidies for remote training (hereinafter “the completion standards”) was also met, on the basis that the 118 trainees are also satisfied.
B. On July 6, 2017, the Defendant restricted subsidies and loans for 360 days (from July 7, 2017 to August 1, 2018) pursuant to Article 55(2) of the former Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (amended by Act No. 13902, Jan. 27, 2016; hereinafter “Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers”); Article 22 and [Attachment Table 6-2] of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (hereinafter “Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers”); Article 56(2) restricting subsidies and loans for 360 days (from July 7, 2017 to August 1, 2018) to KRW 10,57,80, and KRW 250,300, and additionally collecting KRW 56(2) and Article 56(2) of the same Act pursuant to Article 56(2) of the same Act.
(hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case") in total.
On September 27, 2017, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit with the competent court, and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on the same day.