When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 17:30 on April 11, 2014, the Defendant concluded that “A victim C was living in a household building B, which will be exchanged in a room,” with the victim C on the street in front of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul. Cheongbabababa, Cheongbabababa, which will be exchanged on the face of Cheongbababa.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not live in the building B, and there was no intention or ability to deliver another Cheongba, even if he received the above Cheongba from the victim because he did not actually have the right to exchange with the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was issued by the victim a 400,000 won worth of market value, and was handed over from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;