beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.01.08 2019나58827

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The judgment of the first instance is justifiable even when examining the defendant's argument and reason in the trial of the first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. On the second and second sides of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “Seoul around June 8, 2018” shall be deemed to read “ June 7, 2018.”

The third to the third to the 5th of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows.

“C. The Defendant is refusing to deliver the leased portion while continuously occupying it. The amount equivalent to the unpaid rent as of December 29, 2018 is KRW 30,967,740, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 880,000,000 from June 29, 2018 to April 2019. The Plaintiff paid KRW 880,000,000 for the fire safety expenses from June 29, 2018.”

3. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.