However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 8, 2015, at around 00:05, the Defendant assaulted C, one’s wife, at his own residence, B B 205 Dong 104, Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, and listened to the statement of damage against C by the circumstances belonging to the D District Unit of the Gwangju Police Station, dispatched to the site upon receipt of the 112 report, and assaulted C, “Feng few, v. v.’s feat and grow at the house,” and “Ieen feat, v.’s feat, and grow at the house.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of E and C;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] Where the degree of mitigation area of obstruction of performance of official duties (one to eight months) [Special Mitigation] [Determination of sentence] assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor [Determination of sentence] One year after the suspended sentence of April (the fact that the defendant seems to have an offense of violence against the defendant is disadvantageous to the sentencing grounds or that the defendant would not repeat again in violation of his/her court, and other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character, character, occupation, living environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the disposition).