However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 2016, the Defendant would have invested KRW 200,000 in the Defendant’s attempt to operate the game room to the victim D, who runs the news room business at the south point of the C downstream located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, and the victim would not have any money.

In this paper, I tried to see that the victim seems to interfere with the victim's reporting business.

The Defendant threatened the victim and received KRW 2 million around that time from the victim who was frightened by threatening the victim.

2. On November 15, 2016, the Defendant interfering with his/her business: (a) the employee is deemed to have completed the business hours while he/she takes a drinking in the Fran tavern operated by the victim E in Gwangju Mine-gu around 06:30;

For the reason that the studio was studio in the studio, the studio was broken up, and the stude was discarded, and the stude was laid down, and a simple stude in the front of the studter was laid down to the victim, thereby interfering with the victim’s stude business by force.

3. From November 15, 2016 to 06:30 on November 15, 2016, the Defendant interfered with his duties and damaged property, 07:00, on the part of his employees, who had reported her shop with the victim H on the 1st floor of the G underground in Gwangju Mine-gu, with the president’s studio and her studio, she took the president’s studio to the employees who had reported her shop and her shop. The Defendant dumped a knife with the wall by drinking flabing flab, and flabing a knife with a knife with a knife in which flab was loaded.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to H, J, D, E, or K;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 350 (1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of conflict), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), the selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (as agreed with the victims);

1. Social services;